In the run-up to assembly polls, political parties are looking for issues that swing votes, and include those points in their manifestoes as their electoral promises.
Water scarcity is a burning issue across Karnataka, more so in Bengaluru. Political parties avoid addressing this problem. They try to claim credit for a few isolated water projects but fail to fix water issues.
The only way to create a political will is to educate the public about the true nature of the problem and available solutions and nudge them to demand an electoral commitment from all political parties. That’s what lake manifesto is about.
The state already has multiple agencies to work on these solutions. But they can’t fulfil their duties because of political interference. If the political parties commit to their cooperation, various agencies can solve these long-pending issues quickly.
Understanding the problem
At the core is a single agency called Karnataka Tank Conservation and Development Authority (KTCDA), which is supposed to protect, conserve and rejuvenate lakes/tanks in the state.
At present, KTCDA is dysfunctional. It suffers from the lack of:
The public remains unaware of these failures because KTCDA is not mandated to put all this information and plans in the public domain. This lack of transparency can promote corruption.
The solutions
To fix the problems, KTCDA must:
All political parties must support this cause in the assembly by passing resolutions to take time-bound actions with a specific budget allocated for these actions.
They must also pass new statutes or amend existing statutes as follows:
All of the above factors are “hygiene” factors (as opposed to “nice to have” factors). All political parties must commit their nonpartisan support to these points.
Parties must deploy their leaders in all villages, towns and city wards to push for the implementation of these points. Their role is more significant after the elections are over, as only they can maintain pressure on the government to perform relentlessly. Even losing candidates are equally responsible for this, and working on these things can help them earn goodwill.
Project velocity
We all suffer from a cognitive bias called “recency bias”, in which we favour recent events over older events and long-term experiences. Politicians are well-aware of this. That’s why we see a flurry of activities and launches of large projects just before the elections.
The incumbent politician reserves a sizable portion of her/his discretionary budget for such election-oriented spending. The voters fall into this trap and pardon the politician for not acting for so long. Another trick is to brag about the huge amount spent on a project.
To ensure real steady progress, the government must introduce a metric called “project velocity”, which shows the actual progress of any project against time. It focuses on the outcome, not on the money spent.
This makes it impossible for any politician to put up a last-minute show to falsely impress her/his voters.
(The authors are lake and water activists based in Bengaluru)