<p>Public sector banks may have to bear a burden of Rs 1,800-2,000 crore arising due to a recent Supreme Court judgement on the waiver of compound interest on all loan accounts which opted for moratorium during March-August 2020, sources said.</p>.<p>The judgement covers loans above Rs 2 crore as loans below this got blanket interest on interest waiver in November last year. Compound interest support scheme for loan moratorium cost the government Rs 5,500 crore during 2020-21 and the scheme covered all borrowers including the prompt one who did not avail moratorium.</p>.<p>According to banking sources, initially, 60 per cent of borrowers availed moratorium and gradually the percentage came down to 40 per cent and even less as collection improved with ease in lockdown. In case of corporate, this was as low as 25 per cent as far as public sector banks were concerned.</p>.<p><strong><a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/business/business-news/uday-kotak-welcomes-supreme-court-ruling-on-loan-moratorium-965422.html" target="_blank">Read | Uday Kotak welcomes Supreme Court ruling on loan moratorium</a></strong></p>.<p>They further said, banks would provide compound interest waiver for the period a borrower had availed moratorium. For example, if a borrower availed moratorium of three months, the waiver would be for that period.</p>.<p>The RBI on March 27 last year announced a loan moratorium on payment of instalments of term loans falling due between March 1 and May 31, 2020, due to the pandemic, later the same was extended to August 31.</p>.<p>The apex court order this time is only limited to those who availed moratorium so the liability of the public sector bank should be less than Rs 2,000 crore as per rough calculations, sources added.</p>.<p>Besides, they said, the order does not specify a timeframe for the settlement of compound interest unlike last time so banks can devise a mechanism of adjusting or settling it in staggered manner.</p>.<p>Meanwhile, Indian Banks' Association (IBA) has written to the government to compensate lenders for interest on interest waiver.</p>.<p>The government would take a call depending on various considerations.</p>.<p><strong><a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/sc-rules-against-extension-of-loan-moratorium-965333.html" target="_blank">Also Read | SC rules against extension of loan moratorium</a></strong></p>.<p>The Supreme Court last month directed that no compound or penal interest shall be charged from borrowers for the six-month loan moratorium period, which was announced last year amid the Covid-19 pandemic, and the amount already charged shall be refunded, credited or adjusted.</p>.<p>The apex court refused to interfere with the Centre and Reserve Bank of India (RBI's) decision to not extend the loan moratorium beyond August 31 last year, saying it is a policy decision.</p>.<p>Rejecting pleas for a complete waiver on interest the court opined that such a move would have consequences on the economy. The bench also said that interest waiver would affect depositors. Along with this, the court also rejected pleas for further relief in the matter.</p>
<p>Public sector banks may have to bear a burden of Rs 1,800-2,000 crore arising due to a recent Supreme Court judgement on the waiver of compound interest on all loan accounts which opted for moratorium during March-August 2020, sources said.</p>.<p>The judgement covers loans above Rs 2 crore as loans below this got blanket interest on interest waiver in November last year. Compound interest support scheme for loan moratorium cost the government Rs 5,500 crore during 2020-21 and the scheme covered all borrowers including the prompt one who did not avail moratorium.</p>.<p>According to banking sources, initially, 60 per cent of borrowers availed moratorium and gradually the percentage came down to 40 per cent and even less as collection improved with ease in lockdown. In case of corporate, this was as low as 25 per cent as far as public sector banks were concerned.</p>.<p><strong><a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/business/business-news/uday-kotak-welcomes-supreme-court-ruling-on-loan-moratorium-965422.html" target="_blank">Read | Uday Kotak welcomes Supreme Court ruling on loan moratorium</a></strong></p>.<p>They further said, banks would provide compound interest waiver for the period a borrower had availed moratorium. For example, if a borrower availed moratorium of three months, the waiver would be for that period.</p>.<p>The RBI on March 27 last year announced a loan moratorium on payment of instalments of term loans falling due between March 1 and May 31, 2020, due to the pandemic, later the same was extended to August 31.</p>.<p>The apex court order this time is only limited to those who availed moratorium so the liability of the public sector bank should be less than Rs 2,000 crore as per rough calculations, sources added.</p>.<p>Besides, they said, the order does not specify a timeframe for the settlement of compound interest unlike last time so banks can devise a mechanism of adjusting or settling it in staggered manner.</p>.<p>Meanwhile, Indian Banks' Association (IBA) has written to the government to compensate lenders for interest on interest waiver.</p>.<p>The government would take a call depending on various considerations.</p>.<p><strong><a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/sc-rules-against-extension-of-loan-moratorium-965333.html" target="_blank">Also Read | SC rules against extension of loan moratorium</a></strong></p>.<p>The Supreme Court last month directed that no compound or penal interest shall be charged from borrowers for the six-month loan moratorium period, which was announced last year amid the Covid-19 pandemic, and the amount already charged shall be refunded, credited or adjusted.</p>.<p>The apex court refused to interfere with the Centre and Reserve Bank of India (RBI's) decision to not extend the loan moratorium beyond August 31 last year, saying it is a policy decision.</p>.<p>Rejecting pleas for a complete waiver on interest the court opined that such a move would have consequences on the economy. The bench also said that interest waiver would affect depositors. Along with this, the court also rejected pleas for further relief in the matter.</p>