<p>Making unsubstantiated allegation by wife leading to character assassination of a man would constitute cruelty allowing him to seek a divorce, the Delhi High Court has said.</p>.<p>In a decision, a bench of Justices Vipin Sanghi and Rekha Palli dismissed a petition by the wife against a decree of divorce allowed by a family court as she made allegations of husband's illicit relationship with her 'Bhabhi' (sister-in-law).</p>.<p>The court noted she admitted making the allegations, saying it was a known thing in the family and others were also talking about it.</p>.<p>"Unsubstantiated allegations made by a wife, which tantamount to character assassination of the husband, amount to causing mental cruelty to the husband," the bench said.</p>.<p>The court rejected, saying factum of she had made these allegations against the man was also evident from her admission during the cross-examination.</p>.<p>"We are of the view that the Principal Judge, family court, was justified in passing the decree for divorce after holding that such a serious allegation accusing the respondent of illicit intimacy with the appellant’s sister-in-law, which could not be established by the appellant by adducing any cogent or reliable evidence, would amount to mental cruelty," the bench said.</p>.<p>The man, in the instant case, sought divorce on the grounds of desertion by the wife and cruelty due to false allegations of an illicit relationship.</p>
<p>Making unsubstantiated allegation by wife leading to character assassination of a man would constitute cruelty allowing him to seek a divorce, the Delhi High Court has said.</p>.<p>In a decision, a bench of Justices Vipin Sanghi and Rekha Palli dismissed a petition by the wife against a decree of divorce allowed by a family court as she made allegations of husband's illicit relationship with her 'Bhabhi' (sister-in-law).</p>.<p>The court noted she admitted making the allegations, saying it was a known thing in the family and others were also talking about it.</p>.<p>"Unsubstantiated allegations made by a wife, which tantamount to character assassination of the husband, amount to causing mental cruelty to the husband," the bench said.</p>.<p>The court rejected, saying factum of she had made these allegations against the man was also evident from her admission during the cross-examination.</p>.<p>"We are of the view that the Principal Judge, family court, was justified in passing the decree for divorce after holding that such a serious allegation accusing the respondent of illicit intimacy with the appellant’s sister-in-law, which could not be established by the appellant by adducing any cogent or reliable evidence, would amount to mental cruelty," the bench said.</p>.<p>The man, in the instant case, sought divorce on the grounds of desertion by the wife and cruelty due to false allegations of an illicit relationship.</p>