<p>The Supreme Court on Wednesday said there is a need to put an end to uncertainty with regard to NEET PG admissions, as the Centre urged it to allow the counselling, which remained stuck due to objections to Rs 8 lakh annual income criterion for economically weaker section (EWS).</p>.<p>Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, submitted before a bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud and A S Bopanna, "We are at a point where counselling is stuck. We need doctors in this difficult situation, and we as a society cannot go into the reservation and lengthy arguments".</p>.<p>He pointed out the quota dated back to January 2019 and it has been implemented across the country. </p>.<p>Mehta asked the court to allow the counselling to begin, and in the meantime, it could consider the objections.</p>.<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/whats-all-the-hullabaloo-over-ews-quota-in-postgraduate-medical-course-admissions-1068121.html" target="_blank">What's all the hullabaloo over EWS quota in postgraduate medical course admissions? </a></strong></p>.<p>The bench, also comprising Justice A S Bopanna, asked senior advocates Arvind Datar and Shyam Divan, representing the petitioners, their views on Mehta’s suggestion on commencement of counselling.</p>.<p>“We need to put an end to this uncertainty," the bench said.</p>.<p>Mehta also maintained the government would not accept any position whereby the OBC or the EWS, whether before or after the exercise, were deprived of something, legitimately due to them.</p>.<p>He said any intelligent mind can point out errors in the expert panel report, recommending retaining the Rs 8 lakh annual income criterion. </p>.<p>The petitioners’ counsel, on the contrary, submitted that the rules of the game should not change.</p>.<p>During the hearing, Divan argued that postgraduate admissions must be completely merit-based and reservation must be minimal. He referred to Supreme Court judgements which hold that there should be no reservation in super-speciality courses.</p>.<p>In many courses, postgraduate is the end of the road which means super-speciality in some departments. Therefore, the principle of super-speciality will apply to postgraduate courses too, he said. The top court will continue to hear the matter on Thursday.</p>.<p>The Centre has told the top court that Rs 8 lakh income criterion for determining the EWS is much more stringent than the one for the OBC creamy layer.</p>.<p>A group of petitioners led by Neil Aurelio Nunes challenged the Centre's notification of July 29 to implement OBC and EWS reservation in NEET-All India Quota from the current academic session in PG courses.</p>.<p><strong>Check out DH's latest videos</strong></p>
<p>The Supreme Court on Wednesday said there is a need to put an end to uncertainty with regard to NEET PG admissions, as the Centre urged it to allow the counselling, which remained stuck due to objections to Rs 8 lakh annual income criterion for economically weaker section (EWS).</p>.<p>Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, submitted before a bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud and A S Bopanna, "We are at a point where counselling is stuck. We need doctors in this difficult situation, and we as a society cannot go into the reservation and lengthy arguments".</p>.<p>He pointed out the quota dated back to January 2019 and it has been implemented across the country. </p>.<p>Mehta asked the court to allow the counselling to begin, and in the meantime, it could consider the objections.</p>.<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/whats-all-the-hullabaloo-over-ews-quota-in-postgraduate-medical-course-admissions-1068121.html" target="_blank">What's all the hullabaloo over EWS quota in postgraduate medical course admissions? </a></strong></p>.<p>The bench, also comprising Justice A S Bopanna, asked senior advocates Arvind Datar and Shyam Divan, representing the petitioners, their views on Mehta’s suggestion on commencement of counselling.</p>.<p>“We need to put an end to this uncertainty," the bench said.</p>.<p>Mehta also maintained the government would not accept any position whereby the OBC or the EWS, whether before or after the exercise, were deprived of something, legitimately due to them.</p>.<p>He said any intelligent mind can point out errors in the expert panel report, recommending retaining the Rs 8 lakh annual income criterion. </p>.<p>The petitioners’ counsel, on the contrary, submitted that the rules of the game should not change.</p>.<p>During the hearing, Divan argued that postgraduate admissions must be completely merit-based and reservation must be minimal. He referred to Supreme Court judgements which hold that there should be no reservation in super-speciality courses.</p>.<p>In many courses, postgraduate is the end of the road which means super-speciality in some departments. Therefore, the principle of super-speciality will apply to postgraduate courses too, he said. The top court will continue to hear the matter on Thursday.</p>.<p>The Centre has told the top court that Rs 8 lakh income criterion for determining the EWS is much more stringent than the one for the OBC creamy layer.</p>.<p>A group of petitioners led by Neil Aurelio Nunes challenged the Centre's notification of July 29 to implement OBC and EWS reservation in NEET-All India Quota from the current academic session in PG courses.</p>.<p><strong>Check out DH's latest videos</strong></p>