<p>The Supreme Court on Friday refused to consider a PIL for a direction to the government to act on the N N Vohra committee report related to a nexus between politicians and criminals.</p>.<p>A three-judge bench presided over by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul told petitioner BJP leader and advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay it cannot entertain the plea.</p>.<p>The petitioner led by senior advocate Anupam Lal Das contended that some baby steps have been taken but unless fair investigation was undertaken, nothing could be done.</p>.<p>He also pointed out Lokpal did not have an independent investigating agency.</p>.<p>The bench, however, suggested, in jest, the petitioner should write a book, instead of filing petitions.</p>.<p>In his PIL, Upadhyay asked the court to direct the Lokpal-monitored investigation of the criminal political nexus, as referred by the Vohra Committee and directed by the Supreme Court in 1995.</p>.<p>He pointed out the Committee headed by 1959-batch IAS officer examined the problem of criminalisation of politics and the nexus among criminals-politicians-bureaucrats. The panel's report contained serious observations made by central agencies on the criminal network which was virtually running parallel government. </p>.<p>It also discussed about criminal gangs who enjoyed patronage and protection of politicians and public servants and revealed that politicians had become the leaders of the gangs. </p>.<p>"The unpublished annexures of the Vohra Committee report contained highly explosive material that’s why the Supreme Court recommended establishing a high level committee for comprehensive investigation into the findings of the Vohra Committee and to secure the prosecution of all accused," he claimed.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court on Friday refused to consider a PIL for a direction to the government to act on the N N Vohra committee report related to a nexus between politicians and criminals.</p>.<p>A three-judge bench presided over by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul told petitioner BJP leader and advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay it cannot entertain the plea.</p>.<p>The petitioner led by senior advocate Anupam Lal Das contended that some baby steps have been taken but unless fair investigation was undertaken, nothing could be done.</p>.<p>He also pointed out Lokpal did not have an independent investigating agency.</p>.<p>The bench, however, suggested, in jest, the petitioner should write a book, instead of filing petitions.</p>.<p>In his PIL, Upadhyay asked the court to direct the Lokpal-monitored investigation of the criminal political nexus, as referred by the Vohra Committee and directed by the Supreme Court in 1995.</p>.<p>He pointed out the Committee headed by 1959-batch IAS officer examined the problem of criminalisation of politics and the nexus among criminals-politicians-bureaucrats. The panel's report contained serious observations made by central agencies on the criminal network which was virtually running parallel government. </p>.<p>It also discussed about criminal gangs who enjoyed patronage and protection of politicians and public servants and revealed that politicians had become the leaders of the gangs. </p>.<p>"The unpublished annexures of the Vohra Committee report contained highly explosive material that’s why the Supreme Court recommended establishing a high level committee for comprehensive investigation into the findings of the Vohra Committee and to secure the prosecution of all accused," he claimed.</p>