<p class="title">The Supreme Court is going to have a permanent Constitution bench from October 1 to adjudicate upon the cases relating to the interpretation of Constitution, statutes, and laws.</p>.<p class="bodytext">After deciding to set up a single-judge bench to hear bail matters in offences with maximum seven-year jail, this is going to be another historical decision for the Supreme Court to have a permanent Constitution bench.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Normally, the Constitution bench, comprising a minimum of five judges, is set up on a reference made by a three-judge bench on complex questions of law, which require authoritative pronouncement.</p>.<p class="bodytext">At present, one five-judge is considering the Ayodhya dispute matter related to the title suit concerning Babri Masjid and Ram temple.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Out of 59,616 pending matters in the top court as on September 2, 2019, as many as 404 petitions are pending before a five-judge Constitution bench.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Of this, effectively, 46 petitions are mainly related to the subject of law and 358 are connected to it.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Besides, a total of 13 petitions are pending before a seven-judge Constitution bench. Of this, five are related to main issue and eight are connected to it.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Similarly, as many as 136 petitions are yet to be adjudicated by a nine-judge bench. Of which, five are related to main subject and 131 are connected to it.</p>.<p class="bodytext">With the strength of the Supreme Court judges having been raised to 34, it has become a little easier for the CJI to set up a permanent Constitution bench, without disturbing the disposal of other cases.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A total of four judges would be administered the oath of office on Monday by the CJI, taking the number of judges to a maximum number of 34.</p>
<p class="title">The Supreme Court is going to have a permanent Constitution bench from October 1 to adjudicate upon the cases relating to the interpretation of Constitution, statutes, and laws.</p>.<p class="bodytext">After deciding to set up a single-judge bench to hear bail matters in offences with maximum seven-year jail, this is going to be another historical decision for the Supreme Court to have a permanent Constitution bench.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Normally, the Constitution bench, comprising a minimum of five judges, is set up on a reference made by a three-judge bench on complex questions of law, which require authoritative pronouncement.</p>.<p class="bodytext">At present, one five-judge is considering the Ayodhya dispute matter related to the title suit concerning Babri Masjid and Ram temple.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Out of 59,616 pending matters in the top court as on September 2, 2019, as many as 404 petitions are pending before a five-judge Constitution bench.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Of this, effectively, 46 petitions are mainly related to the subject of law and 358 are connected to it.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Besides, a total of 13 petitions are pending before a seven-judge Constitution bench. Of this, five are related to main issue and eight are connected to it.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Similarly, as many as 136 petitions are yet to be adjudicated by a nine-judge bench. Of which, five are related to main subject and 131 are connected to it.</p>.<p class="bodytext">With the strength of the Supreme Court judges having been raised to 34, it has become a little easier for the CJI to set up a permanent Constitution bench, without disturbing the disposal of other cases.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A total of four judges would be administered the oath of office on Monday by the CJI, taking the number of judges to a maximum number of 34.</p>