<p>The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Centre on a plea against appointment of Gujarat cadre IPS officer Rakesh Asthana as Delhi police commissioner, just three days before his retirement.</p>.<p>A bench presided over by Justice D Y Chandrachud sought a response from the Union government and Asthana within two weeks.</p>.<p>Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for NGO 'Centre for Public Interest Litigation', challenged the Delhi HC judgement, which upheld Asthana's appointment. </p>.<p>He sought an early date of hearing.</p>.<p>Solicitor General Tushar Mehta represented the Centre and senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi appeared for Asthana.</p>.<p><strong>Also Read — <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/north-and-central/delhi-police-chiefs-legal-advisor-suresh-chandra-resigns-1051268.html" target="_blank">Delhi Police chief's legal advisor Suresh Chandra resigns</a></strong></p>.<p>The court put the matter for consideration on December 13.</p>.<p>On October 12, the High Court had dismissed a plea against appointment of Asthana, a 1984-batch officer, as the Delhi police commissioner on July 27, just before his superannuation on July 31.</p>.<p>The court had then declared that the Union government had power, jurisdiction and authority to make inter-cadre deputation of officers in public interest and the top court's judgements in Prakash Singh case on appointment of police heads would not apply to Union Territories.</p>.<p>It had also said the petitioners --advocate Sadre Alam and NGO CPIL led by advocate Bhushan-- have not been able to make out a case calling for interference or even remotely demonstrate that there is any blot in the service career of Asthana, making him unsuitable for the post of Delhi police commissioner. </p>.<p><strong>Watch the latest DH Videos here:</strong></p>
<p>The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Centre on a plea against appointment of Gujarat cadre IPS officer Rakesh Asthana as Delhi police commissioner, just three days before his retirement.</p>.<p>A bench presided over by Justice D Y Chandrachud sought a response from the Union government and Asthana within two weeks.</p>.<p>Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for NGO 'Centre for Public Interest Litigation', challenged the Delhi HC judgement, which upheld Asthana's appointment. </p>.<p>He sought an early date of hearing.</p>.<p>Solicitor General Tushar Mehta represented the Centre and senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi appeared for Asthana.</p>.<p><strong>Also Read — <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/north-and-central/delhi-police-chiefs-legal-advisor-suresh-chandra-resigns-1051268.html" target="_blank">Delhi Police chief's legal advisor Suresh Chandra resigns</a></strong></p>.<p>The court put the matter for consideration on December 13.</p>.<p>On October 12, the High Court had dismissed a plea against appointment of Asthana, a 1984-batch officer, as the Delhi police commissioner on July 27, just before his superannuation on July 31.</p>.<p>The court had then declared that the Union government had power, jurisdiction and authority to make inter-cadre deputation of officers in public interest and the top court's judgements in Prakash Singh case on appointment of police heads would not apply to Union Territories.</p>.<p>It had also said the petitioners --advocate Sadre Alam and NGO CPIL led by advocate Bhushan-- have not been able to make out a case calling for interference or even remotely demonstrate that there is any blot in the service career of Asthana, making him unsuitable for the post of Delhi police commissioner. </p>.<p><strong>Watch the latest DH Videos here:</strong></p>