<p>Chennai: Madras High Court on Tuesday restrained a leading newspaper group from granting an award in the name of Carnatic music legend M S Subbulakshmi to the winner of the Sangita Kalanidhi -- to be conferred on T M Krishna this year – instituted by the prestigious The Music Academy, Chennai. </p><p>The verdict came on a petition filed by Subbulakshmi’s grandson, V Shrinivasan, who objected to an award in the name of the iconic singer being conferred on Krishna, considered a rebel by many Carnatic vocalists for his outspoken nature.</p><p>According to the petition, The Hindu Group has been presenting a cash prize of Rs 1 lakh to the Sangita Kalanidhi awardee in the name of Sangita Kalanidhi M S Subbulakshmi Award since 2006. Subbulakshmi became the first woman to receive the title in 1968.</p>.M S Subbulakshmi’s grandson goes to court over award for T M Krishna.<p>Justice G Jayachandran, who heard the case, held that instituting an award in Subbulakshmi’s name has gone against her wish, while opining that the award should not be given in her name. However, he clarified that there was no bar on the Music Academy conferring awards on Krishna.</p><p>Shrinivasan’s objection was not only to the award being presented to Krishna, whom he accused of making “vile, vituperative and scandalous attacks” on Subbulakshmi, but also instituting an award, in general, in the name of the late singer, by arguing that it is against her will. </p><p>He contended in his plea that Subbulakshmi, in her last will and testament executed in 1997, specifically said that no trust, foundation, or a memorial of any kind should be made in her name nor any funds or donations should be collected. </p><p>The decision by the Music Academy in March this year to confer Sangita Kalanidhi on Krishna during the 2024 Music Festival in December triggered a major row in the conservative Carnatic music industry. </p><p>Those who opposed Krishna being chosen for the award accused him “vilifying” the Carnatic music world and argued that it was dangerous to overlook his “glorification of a figure” like EVR Periyar who they said “openly proposed a genocide of Brahmins.” </p><p>While Ranjani-Gayatri pulled out of the season, many others threatened to return their awards. </p><p>Krishna, who started performing at the age of six, stopped performing at the annual Margazhi Festival since 2015, after making it clear that he feels “aesthetically, socially, and philosophically disconnected from the music season.” </p><p>He has also been performing at unconventional spaces, including buses and metro trains, besides before fishermen. </p><p>However, he accepted the Music Academy’s decision to confer the Sangita Kalanidhi on him, saying it is important to recognise that some things have changed (in the sabhas) in the past 10 years. </p><p>“My choices as a musician and as an individual are there in the public domain for everybody to see. I believe in continuing to have complicated conversations and move forward musically, aesthetically, and socially to come together to realize what we all want to be as people living together,” Krishna had told DH in March.</p>
<p>Chennai: Madras High Court on Tuesday restrained a leading newspaper group from granting an award in the name of Carnatic music legend M S Subbulakshmi to the winner of the Sangita Kalanidhi -- to be conferred on T M Krishna this year – instituted by the prestigious The Music Academy, Chennai. </p><p>The verdict came on a petition filed by Subbulakshmi’s grandson, V Shrinivasan, who objected to an award in the name of the iconic singer being conferred on Krishna, considered a rebel by many Carnatic vocalists for his outspoken nature.</p><p>According to the petition, The Hindu Group has been presenting a cash prize of Rs 1 lakh to the Sangita Kalanidhi awardee in the name of Sangita Kalanidhi M S Subbulakshmi Award since 2006. Subbulakshmi became the first woman to receive the title in 1968.</p>.M S Subbulakshmi’s grandson goes to court over award for T M Krishna.<p>Justice G Jayachandran, who heard the case, held that instituting an award in Subbulakshmi’s name has gone against her wish, while opining that the award should not be given in her name. However, he clarified that there was no bar on the Music Academy conferring awards on Krishna.</p><p>Shrinivasan’s objection was not only to the award being presented to Krishna, whom he accused of making “vile, vituperative and scandalous attacks” on Subbulakshmi, but also instituting an award, in general, in the name of the late singer, by arguing that it is against her will. </p><p>He contended in his plea that Subbulakshmi, in her last will and testament executed in 1997, specifically said that no trust, foundation, or a memorial of any kind should be made in her name nor any funds or donations should be collected. </p><p>The decision by the Music Academy in March this year to confer Sangita Kalanidhi on Krishna during the 2024 Music Festival in December triggered a major row in the conservative Carnatic music industry. </p><p>Those who opposed Krishna being chosen for the award accused him “vilifying” the Carnatic music world and argued that it was dangerous to overlook his “glorification of a figure” like EVR Periyar who they said “openly proposed a genocide of Brahmins.” </p><p>While Ranjani-Gayatri pulled out of the season, many others threatened to return their awards. </p><p>Krishna, who started performing at the age of six, stopped performing at the annual Margazhi Festival since 2015, after making it clear that he feels “aesthetically, socially, and philosophically disconnected from the music season.” </p><p>He has also been performing at unconventional spaces, including buses and metro trains, besides before fishermen. </p><p>However, he accepted the Music Academy’s decision to confer the Sangita Kalanidhi on him, saying it is important to recognise that some things have changed (in the sabhas) in the past 10 years. </p><p>“My choices as a musician and as an individual are there in the public domain for everybody to see. I believe in continuing to have complicated conversations and move forward musically, aesthetically, and socially to come together to realize what we all want to be as people living together,” Krishna had told DH in March.</p>