The petitioner had contended that she and her mother were followers of a ‘dharma guru’ (religious leader) and that the latter had got them to sign some blank papers saying that he wanted them to become regular members of his religious institution.
She further said in her petition that the ‘dharma guru’ later informed her father that he (guru) had married his daughter at an ‘Arya Samaj’ Temple and also that the marriage had been registered.
The petitioner then approached the family court seeking that the marriage be declared void as she had been tricked into signing the papers. The respondent, however, contested the claim and filed an application seeking restitution of his conjugal rights.
The family court rejected the woman’s application but accepted the application of the ‘dharma guru’.
The woman then challenged the family court’s decision in the high court. The court, in it's judgement, said that the onus to prove that the marriage was solemnised in accordance with the Hindu traditions was on the 'dharma guru' but he failed to do so and hence the marriage was 'void'.
It said that the marriage certificate issued by the Arya Samaj temple was of of no significance in the absence of the rituals in the marriage.
Published 11 July 2024, 13:09 IST