Ajit Pawar’s problem is that he might be ambitious, but he is not a leader.
Unlike his uncle, Ajit Pawar has failed to create a constituency for himself outside politics, comprising well-wishers, the middle class, writers, and artistes. He has failed to do this despite being in power for several years. What is needed to be a leader is that one needs to create goodwill among various sections and go the extra mile to become the talking point among them. Maharashtra’s ethos is that the leader takes ample interest in the arts and artistes, writers and intellectuals, students and professors. Former Maharashtra chief minister Yashwantrao Chavan was the ideal example, and it was also followed by his ‘manasputra’.
Analysing Ajit Pawar’s political decisions since he split the NCP, it is clear that he has not understood what makes Sharad Pawar tick. If he had, the deputy chief minister would not have fielded his wife Sunetra from Baramati against Sule in the Lok Sabha polls; a move he rues now.
Ajit Pawar has a hard worker and a taskmaster, but a makeover will be a herculean task; some reports suggest he has engaged top consultants for the job. The problem, however, is that he neither has any story to tell, nor are people aware of him beyond being the nephew of Sharad Pawar. The problem of identity is a daunting one and none of the leaders surrounding Aji Pawar have an independent stature in politics. In that sense, all of them were enjoying power in the reflected glory of Sharad Pawar.