<p>Life expectancy for young people can be as much as 14 years shorter in violent countries compared to peaceful nations, according to a global study.</p>.<p>A team, led by researchers at the University of Oxford in the UK, shows a direct link between the uncertainty of living in a violent setting and a "double burden" of shorter and less predictable lives, even for those not directly involved in the violence.</p>.<p>The study, published in the journal Science Advances, estimates a gap of around 14 years in remaining life expectancy -- the number of years a person can expect to live -- at age 10 between the least and most violent countries.</p>.<p>In El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala and Colombia, the gap in life expectancy with high income countries is predominantly explained by excess mortality due to homicides, they said.</p>.<p>"What we found most striking is that lifetime uncertainty has a greater association with violence than life expectancy," said Jose Manuel Aburto from Oxford's Leverhulme Center for Demographic Science.</p>.<p>"Lifetime uncertainty, therefore, should not be overlooked when analysing changes in mortality patterns," said Aburto, lead author of the study.</p>.<p>Using mortality data from 162 countries, and the Internal Peace Index between 2008–2017, the study shows the most violent countries are also those with the highest lifetime uncertainty.</p>.<p>In the Middle East, conflict-related deaths at young ages are the biggest contributor to this, while in Latin America, a similar pattern results from homicides and interpersonal violence, the researchers said.</p>.<p>However, lifetime uncertainty was "remarkably low" between 2008–2017, in most Northern and Southern European countries, they said.</p>.<p>The researchers found that in high-income countries, reduced cancer mortality has recently helped to reduce lifetime uncertainty.</p>.<p>However, in the most violent societies, lifetime uncertainty is even experienced by those not directly involved in violence.</p>.<p>"Whilst men are the major direct victims of violence, women are more likely to experience non-fatal consequences in violent contexts," said study co-author Professor Ridhi Kashyap, from the Leverhulme Center.</p>.<p>"These indirect effects of violence should not be ignored as they fuel gender inequalities, and can trigger other forms of vulnerability and causes of death," Kashyap said.</p>.<p>According to the study, lower life expectancy is usually associated with greater lifetime uncertainty. Living in a violent society creates vulnerability and uncertainty, and that, in turn, can lead to more violent behaviour.</p>
<p>Life expectancy for young people can be as much as 14 years shorter in violent countries compared to peaceful nations, according to a global study.</p>.<p>A team, led by researchers at the University of Oxford in the UK, shows a direct link between the uncertainty of living in a violent setting and a "double burden" of shorter and less predictable lives, even for those not directly involved in the violence.</p>.<p>The study, published in the journal Science Advances, estimates a gap of around 14 years in remaining life expectancy -- the number of years a person can expect to live -- at age 10 between the least and most violent countries.</p>.<p>In El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala and Colombia, the gap in life expectancy with high income countries is predominantly explained by excess mortality due to homicides, they said.</p>.<p>"What we found most striking is that lifetime uncertainty has a greater association with violence than life expectancy," said Jose Manuel Aburto from Oxford's Leverhulme Center for Demographic Science.</p>.<p>"Lifetime uncertainty, therefore, should not be overlooked when analysing changes in mortality patterns," said Aburto, lead author of the study.</p>.<p>Using mortality data from 162 countries, and the Internal Peace Index between 2008–2017, the study shows the most violent countries are also those with the highest lifetime uncertainty.</p>.<p>In the Middle East, conflict-related deaths at young ages are the biggest contributor to this, while in Latin America, a similar pattern results from homicides and interpersonal violence, the researchers said.</p>.<p>However, lifetime uncertainty was "remarkably low" between 2008–2017, in most Northern and Southern European countries, they said.</p>.<p>The researchers found that in high-income countries, reduced cancer mortality has recently helped to reduce lifetime uncertainty.</p>.<p>However, in the most violent societies, lifetime uncertainty is even experienced by those not directly involved in violence.</p>.<p>"Whilst men are the major direct victims of violence, women are more likely to experience non-fatal consequences in violent contexts," said study co-author Professor Ridhi Kashyap, from the Leverhulme Center.</p>.<p>"These indirect effects of violence should not be ignored as they fuel gender inequalities, and can trigger other forms of vulnerability and causes of death," Kashyap said.</p>.<p>According to the study, lower life expectancy is usually associated with greater lifetime uncertainty. Living in a violent society creates vulnerability and uncertainty, and that, in turn, can lead to more violent behaviour.</p>